Hosted vs Self-Hosted LLMs — Real Cost Analysis for Engineering Teams
What you actually pay when you run Llama 4, DeepSeek V4, or Qwen 3.5 on your own infra vs. Groq, Together, and Replicate. A clear breakdown for teams with 10–500 engineers.
Hosted vs Self-Hosted LLMs — Real Cost Analysis for Engineering Teams
Last Updated: May 2026
Everyone talks about "running LLMs locally" like it's free. It's not free. And hosted isn't always expensive. Here's the honest cost breakdown across the four realistic options for engineering teams in 2026.
The Four Options We Evaluated
1. Groq — hosted, specialized LPU inference hardware
2. Together AI — hosted, multi-model marketplace
3. Ollama + local GPU — self-hosted, your hardware
4. Replicate + open weights — hosted, but you bring your own model
Cost Model: 10 Engineers, Moderate Usage
Baseline: 10 engineers, each running ~20 AI-assisted tasks/day, average 800 tokens input + 400 tokens output per task.
Monthly throughput: 160,000 tasks × 1,200 tokens = 192M tokens/month
| Provider | Model | Cost/Million Tokens | Monthly Cost |
|---|---|---|---|
| Groq | Llama 4 70B | $0.08 | $15 |
| Groq | DeepSeek V4 | $0.12 | $23 |
| Together AI | Llama 4 70B | $0.90 | $173 |
| Replicate | Llama 4 70B | $1.10 | $211 |
| Ollama local (RTX 4090) | Llama 4 8B | $0 (GPU amortized) | ~$120/month electricity |
| Ollama local (A100 40GB) | Llama 4 70B | $0 | ~$280/month electricity |
Groq's LPU hardware is genuinely in a different cost league for this workload. At 192M tokens/month, you're paying less than $25 for the month.
Where Self-Hosting Actually Wins
Self-hosting wins on two axes: privacy and high-volume batch processing.
If you're running 10M+ tokens per day (300M/month), the math flips. At that scale, GPU amortization spreads across so many tokens that local inference undercuts hosted by 60-80%.
More importantly: data sovereignty. If your LLM workload touches user data, healthcare records, financial data, or anything with GDPR implications, hosted providers may not be an option regardless of cost. Self-hosting on your own VPC is the only path that keeps data in your jurisdiction.
The Real Cost Nobody Talks About
GPU amortization math looks simple until you add:
- •Engineering time: Someone needs to maintain the Ollama deployment, handle model updates, manage GPU fleet health. Estimate 0.1–0.3 FTE ongoing for a small team. At $150k/year loaded cost: $15k–$45k/year.
- •Downtime risk: Self-hosted means you're on-call for GPU failures. Model restarts take 5–15 minutes. Do you have ops coverage?
- •Model freshness: Hosted providers update models automatically. Self-hosting means you manage that lifecycle.
Speed Comparison (Tokens/Second)
| Setup | Model | Tokens/Second |
|---|---|---|
| Groq | DeepSeek V4 | 320 tok/s |
| Groq | Llama 4 70B | 280 tok/s |
| Together AI | Llama 4 70B | 85 tok/s |
| Ollama (RTX 4090) | Llama 4 8B | 45 tok/s |
| Ollama (RTX 4090) | Llama 4 70B | 12 tok/s |
| Ollama (A100 40GB) | Llama 4 70B | 38 tok/s |
Groq is 8–10x faster than local RTX 4090 for large models. For interactive coding agents where latency matters, this is the difference between an agent that feels responsive and one that feels sluggish.
Recommendation Matrix
| Scenario | Recommended |
|---|---|
| Startup with sensitive data, < 500M tokens/month | Self-hosted Ollama on AWS A100 spot |
| Growing team, need speed, limited ops capacity | Groq + Together AI mix |
| Enterprise with compliance requirements | Self-hosted on-prem or private cloud |
| Prototype / MVPs | Groq (cheapest and fastest to start) |
| High-volume production (>1B tokens/month) | Self-hosted A100 cluster |
The hosted vs self-hosted debate usually isn't really about cost — it's about ops capacity and data constraints. If you have a small team without dedicated infra engineers, the mental overhead of self-hosting almost never pays back in money saved.
Share this article
About NeuralStackly Engineering
Expert researcher and writer at NeuralStackly, dedicated to finding the best AI tools to boost productivity and business growth.
View all postsRelated Articles
Continue reading with these related posts
The Local-First AI Stack — No API Keys Required
The Local-First AI Stack — No API Keys Required
Build a full AI coding workflow without touching OpenAI. Ollama + OpenCode + n8n = complete autonomy on your own hardware. Here's the setup that actually works.
DeepSeek V4: China's Trillion-Parameter Open-Source Model Launches Amid Distillation Controversy
DeepSeek V4: China's Trillion-Parameter Open-Source Model Launches Amid Distillation Controversy
DeepSeek V4 arrives with 1 trillion parameters and 1M context window, but faces accusations from Anthropic and OpenAI of industrial-scale model extraction. First major AI model ...
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: Google's Fastest Model at 1/8th the Cost of Pro
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: Google's Fastest Model at 1/8th the Cost of Pro
Google's Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite delivers 2.5x faster response times at $0.25 per million input tokens — roughly one-eighth the cost of Gemini 3.1 Pro. New thinking levels feature...
Claude Sonnet 4.6: Anthropic's Mid-Tier Model Now Matches Flagship Opus at One-Fifth the Cost
Claude Sonnet 4.6: Anthropic's Mid-Tier Model Now Matches Flagship Opus at One-Fifth the Cost
Anthropic's Claude Sonnet 4.6 delivers near-Opus performance across coding, computer use, and agentic tasks while costing 80% less. The new default model features a 1M token con...
AI Agents in Production — What Actually Works After 6 Months
AI Agents in Production — What Actually Works After 6 Months
After running autonomous agents on real projects for 6 months: the patterns that survive contact with production, the ones that die in week one, and the guardrails that actually...